Jira logo

Turn internal IT requests into prioritised Jira issues

Internal IT requests become prioritised issues on the team board, with the change type as the summary and a requested completion date.

When this happens

New submission on your "IT request" form

Do this

Create a Jira issue in your service project with the request type as the summary, the details in the description, and Priority mapped from the urgency field

One-directional. A submission triggers the action — nothing is written back into your form.

Internal IT requests arrive as chat messages, and chat messages scroll away. A short form in front of the team gives the queue a fixed shape — a change type, a system, a priority and a date someone needs it by — and the board keeps all of it.

The teams that adopt this are usually two or three people supporting a whole company, who need the board to answer what was agreed without anyone rereading a thread from last Tuesday.

Setting it up

  1. 1

    Publish the change request form and keep it short. The fewer questions there are, the more likely people use it instead of messaging the team directly.

  2. 2

    Open your Jira project's priority scheme and word the form's priority dropdown to match those names exactly, capitalisation included.

  3. 3

    In Zapier, connect the formformform "New Submission" trigger to the form and load a sample submission.

  4. 4

    Add "Create Issue" and select the service project the team works from. Leave Issue Type as Task unless the project uses its own request types.

  5. 5

    Build the summary from the change type and the system name together, giving every issue a scannable shape such as "Access change — Salesforce".

  6. 6

    Map the description of the change and the business impact answer into the issue description, keeping impact last so it reads as the justification.

  7. 7

    Map the requested completion date to the due date and the priority answer to Priority, so the board sorts itself without anyone re-reading requests.

  8. 8

    Submit one test request at each priority level to confirm the mapping holds, then turn the Zap on.

What maps where

Using the Software Change Request Form as the starting point. These are its real fields — swap in your own and the mapping works the same way.

Form fieldJira
Change TypeFirst half of the Jira issue summary
Application or System NameSecond half of the summary, or a component
Priority LevelPriority field on the issue
Description of Change RequestedIssue description, main body
Business Impact if Not CompletedDescription, justification section
Requested Completion DateDue date on the issue

Variations worth knowing

Hold requests until a manager approves

Add an approval question to the form and a Zapier filter that only continues when it is answered. Unapproved requests still record as submissions in formformform, they simply never reach the board.

Split access work from change work

Use paths on the change type answer: access requests create issues in the service project, code and configuration changes go to the platform project. One form, two boards, nothing typed in twice.

If something isn't arriving

Priority is mapped but the board shows everything as Medium.

Jira falls back to the scheme default when an incoming value matches no priority name. Check the exact spelling in Jira's project settings and make the form dropdown use those words, capital letters and all.

Some issues arrive with a gap in the summary.

A summary built from two answers leaves a blank space rather than failing when one is empty. Make the system name a required question on the form so both halves of the summary are always present.

Frequently asked questions

Can requesters see where their request has got to?

Not through the form. Nothing is written back from Jira to formformform. Teams usually share a filtered Jira board or a dashboard link company-wide instead, so people can look their own request up by name.

What stops people bypassing the form and messaging us anyway?

The Zap cannot help with that, but a short form can. Six questions takes under a minute, and every request that comes through arrives with a priority and a deadline already stated, which is the argument for using it.

Can one form serve two different IT teams?

Yes. Branch on the change type with Zapier paths and give each path its own project and issue type. Conditional logic in the form can also hide the questions that only one of the two teams needs answered.

Related automations

Build the form first

The automation needs somewhere to fire from. Publish a form, connect it once, and every submission from then on runs this flow.

Start free